P1: You’re still interested in a person and continue to communicate with them.
P2: The other party is no longer
P3: The other party is no longer interested.
C: You just got ghosted
Ghosting is an infamous, colloquial, and acceptable phenomenon in modern dating. It’s today’s euphemism for “no longer interested.” No one Loves being ghosted unless well, they were as enthusiastically disinterested in the other party as well. So that begs the question-when is it Good to ghost someone? Here’s my philosophical and applicable take on the ethics of ghosting.
Ghosting can only be Considered ghosting when communication and/or interaction has been opened in the first place. You can’t ghost someone or cut communication with someone if there wasn’t an exchange in the first place.
And what is
considered “communication” can be subjectively interpreted. I think for the
ghosting to have taken place, there should have been substantial communication
either in quality OR quantity. If there was explicit romantic implication in
question, then it’s considered ghosting. If there were multiple counts of
active communication and engagement, then it’s ghosting.
It’s Not Ghosting, It’s Rejection
If it’s too early to even access a person, then it’s not ghosting. Without the threshold and the right context. It just isn’t. It’s not ghosting if someone didn’t reciprocate your interest. It’s not ghosting also, if they didn’t reciprocate your enthusiasm. It’s rejection.
Dating is just like the hiring process. Courtship has stages and so it’s not ghosting if the company of interest never called or returned your email or followed up even with a phone call. You just didn’t make the cut.
any investment, the more you put into something, the higher the stakes. So the
more dates, conversations, and interactions you have with someone, the less
ground you have to “ghost” usually.
approachable to ghost someone I went on one date with rather than 2 or 3 dates
it’s more polite to not express disinterest and ghost instead. It might be
imposing or ruder to have an assumption that the other party would want to be
informed of your disinterest in the first place.
Facebook, Snap Chat, Instagram are all platforms in which you can
instantaneously connect with someone, and just as easily, part. If you have
interacted with the person way more virtually than physically, then ghosting is
not even a second thought. Technology, in essence, dilutes the confrontation.
When Ghosting is
I think the most important factor to mull over when deciding
to ghost or not, is to figure out if ghosting will aid or worsen the situation.
Will it do more harm to ghost or less? Will it add more fire to reject someone
explicitly (though still respectfully)? Ask yourself if it’s purely for the
sake of your own feelings.
Ghosting may be necessary if even After you rejected someone directly and they still don’t understand. It may also be justified when the other party did something that warrants you to exit out of their life without explanation. I’m talking about that one killer bad ass example of a woman basically disappearing from her cheating soon-to-be-ex-bf’s life. Yeah. Ghosting’s pretty awesome then.
When Ghosting isn’t
This honestly, comes down to your own value system. If you personally believe that after an X amount of time or Y kind of relationship, that someone should have a face-to-face conversation with you about it not working, then it’s not acceptable; whereas if it was Z, ghosting’s acceptable to you. Conversely, someone who didn’t have X, Y, or Z, may Still want some explanation.
I’d say just stick to your value system and don’t treat someone in a way you wouldn’t want to be treated.
In today’s age, ghosting always happens and will continue to do so. Instead of feeling frustrated over someone ghosting, one should instead, give others the benefit of the doubt. Also, I think it’s healthy to be comfortable with rejection whether it be explicitly, implicitly, or Ghostly communicated. Live with ghosting. Don’t hate the ghoster. They are just phantoms after all.
Signup for Our Newsletter